Economic Inequality in the United States
In all democratic
and free-market societies, economic inequality exists. Even in communist and
socialist countries, the inequality gap exists. It’s only natural that there’s
a gap between the rich and the poor in America. Even during the American
Revolution, 45% of the wealth belonged to the top 10% of the population.[i]
Economic inequality isn’t new to America, and it’s very likely that it’s
something that may never be completely figured out. There are strategies that
have been implemented to lower the gap, however it’s debated whether the
strategies actually work. One strategy is raising taxes on the rich. The goal
here is to help stabilize the country’s debt while narrowing the ceiling and
ground of the rich and poor, respectively. Warren Buffet, one of the wealthiest
men in America, is a staunch supporter of raising taxes on the rich. He argues
that proportionally, the amount of taxes that the wealthy pay compared to the
poor is unjust. Congressman Paul Ryan on the other hand, argues that raising
taxes on the rich hurts job growth for the unemployed. He argues that if we
took taxes from “millionaires and billionaires,” it would only run our
government for “4 months.” It’s argued that if we raise taxes on the rich, it
will regress job growth because the employers will have less of an incentive to
work as hard, and less of an incentive to grow their businesses, meaning they
will stop hiring. According to Ryan, by 2013 the highest tax bracket will be
around 40%, while countries like Canada and Britain are in the 20% range, he
argues that that’s the reason why jobs are going overseas. He goes on to say
that as a free market, we shouldn’t raise taxes on a certain group of people,
because it simply is not fair. According to inequality.org however, in 2007
23.5% of “the national income belonged to the top 1%.” That’s the largest
percentage of the wealth’s money since 1928, one year before the Great
Depression hit the United States. There’s no true answer as to how we can solve
economic inequality. We can be like a European country and have extremely high
taxes and many government supported benefits, or we could continue our practice
of free market capitalism where the government is conceivably supposed to be laissez
faire. According to a 2011 article in the WSJ, it stated that, “the share of
income controlled by the top 1% grew to 20% from 12%.” The article went on to
explain that during this growth, the taxes for the wealthy only grew from 24%
to 28%, meaning “the top 1% share of income grew nearly five times faster than
their share of taxes.” Clearly, there is economic inequality in America; the proverbial
gap between the rich and the poor seems to be growing by the year, raising
taxes may be the answer to lowering that gap, however it raising taxes would
have their disadvantages as well.
You made a statement that economic inequality is inevitable in a market economy (true) but did not state why this must be the case. A good paper is not only descriptive but it must explain. Your response to number 1 & 3 was excellent because you used the relevant data provided to make your argument. You did not really answer #2.
ReplyDelete9/10